{"id":2070,"date":"2025-04-21T07:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-21T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ggservers.com\/blog\/?p=2070"},"modified":"2025-12-05T19:08:40","modified_gmt":"2025-12-05T19:08:40","slug":"mojang-should-listen-to-redstoners-a-balanced-take-on-the-redstone-experiments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ggservers.com\/blog\/mojang-should-listen-to-redstoners-a-balanced-take-on-the-redstone-experiments\/","title":{"rendered":"Mojang Should Listen to Redstoners: A Balanced Take on the Redstone Experiments"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Redstone engineers in Minecraft have always had a love-hate relationship with Mojang’s updates. And with the recent Redstone experiments<\/em>, the community is buzzing again. While not everyone agrees, there’s one thing that’s becoming clear \u2014 not all Redstone changes should be tossed aside<\/strong>, and Mojang needs to listen more carefully to the Redstone community.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before we dive in<\/strong>, don\u2019t forget \u2014 if you\u2019re looking to host your own Minecraft server and test all these Redstone builds in peace, use the code BLOG30<\/code> at GGServers.com<\/a> for 30% off<\/strong> your first server. Perfect for Redstone labs!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

The Villager Update Shows a New Direction<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

When Mojang introduced the 1.21.5 update, they made a wise choice: only adjusting trades for the cartographer and wandering trader. Why? Because the rest of the changes were controversial. They listened<\/em> to feedback and made a partial implementation<\/em> that didn’t break the game balance. This move proved that Mojang is capable of selectively applying community-supported changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And that’s exactly what they should do with the Redstone experiments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

What’s Good About the Redstone Experiments?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s be real: locationality sucked<\/strong>. It made Redstone a pain to work with \u2014 builds behaved differently just based on where they were in the world. That\u2019s not fun. Mojang\u2019s removal of locationality was amazing<\/em> and a massive win for technical players<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This part of the experiment was widely praised. It fixed a long-standing annoyance and made Redstone more consistent<\/em>. If Mojang wants to do right by its players, this specific improvement should absolutely<\/em> be added to vanilla Minecraft.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

What Went Wrong?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Then came the block update changes<\/strong> \u2014 and this is where the experiment crashed. These tweaks broke existing Redstone machines, flying contraptions, and relied on behavior that has been stable for years. The community wasn\u2019t asking for this. In fact, there are better, smarter ways to improve performance without breaking core mechanics<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why fix something that wasn’t broken?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n

A Fair Compromise<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The best way forward? Do what Mojang did with the villager trades<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n\n